Class Actions · Mass Torts · Securities FraudCall (918) 238-6445

Attorney advertisingBriefSecurities & Shareholder

Supreme Court: SEC disgorgement does not require proof of investor loss

Responsible attorney: Lou Schwartz, Schwartz & Associates, PC, Atlanta, Georgia. intake@snalawyers.com

In Sripetch v. SEC, a unanimous Court held that the SEC does not have to show that investors suffered a financial loss before a court orders a defendant to disgorge the proceeds of a fraud. The decision affirmed the Ninth Circuit and resolved a split with the Second Circuit, which had required that showing.

Why it matters. Disgorgement is one of the ways money is returned to harmed investors, and the ruling removes a defense argument against it.

Sources

  1. Opinion (supremecourt.gov)

Briefs summarize public developments. Unless stated otherwise, the firm is not counsel in the matters described, and allegations are not findings.

General information, not legal advice. Reading this article or using the intake assistant does not create an attorney-client relationship.

If something happened to more people than you, tell us.

Many class actions begin with one person who noticed a pattern. Reviewing your information costs nothing and creates no obligation.